There’s a new study out that, yet again, shows that texting doesn’t negatively affect children’s language abilities:
The study, published in Reading and Writing, involved third-year psychology students led by Professor Connie Varnhagen to examine minors’ text usage habits. The group surveyed 40 students between the ages of 12 and 17, asking them to save their instant messages for a week and then complete a standardized spelling test at the end of the survey. What they found was not what everyone has come to expect—that kids who engage heavily in abbreviated chat would perform poorly on spelling tests—but that kids’ text speak generally mirrored their real-life skills.
“Kids who are good spellers [academically] are good spellers in instant messaging,” Varnhagen said. “And kids who are poor spellers in English class are poor spellers in instant messaging.”
But there’s more (good) news from the study:
Varnhagen added that using this “new type of language” and translating it to standard English requires more concentration and attention than simply sticking to English, akin to “a little brain workout.”
I feel it’s really best to compare texting to language dualism, i.e. a second language; it doesn’t replace or hinder your primary language, but is something that can be used along with it. The simple act of translating between the two, then, is very much something of a mental workout, encouraging concentration and developing your brain’s elasticity.
(Via The Barking Robot.)
Sep 23, 2009 :: Tagged under: language, sociology of children, texting :: #